Open letter to the executive of P.D. N.H.S. Trust

In my attempts to create an equitable context where in relevant facts, Truth if you will, can be transparently assessed in pursuit of what in law is called effective remedy, I appear to have unearthed a deviant malignancy, within the P.D. Trust. It is in the public interest that the systemic shortfalls are brought to light. All opportunity was afforded the staff and the executive to aid the long overdue resolution that would at least have exonerated the Trust the hospital and the executive, may even have offered a plea in mitigation as to why a member of your nursing staff was allowed to act criminally , to the harm of the patient. Time passes not so the statute of limitations, nor the glaring need for pertinent detail to be analysed. The means by which the matters of complaint were investigated, both by the regulatory executive and the police need to be exposed to scrutiny as the lives of many vulnerable people are put at risk.
I'm happy to relate all details of circumstance that by the Nelsonian investigators and overseers appear to have been over looked, in spite of victim complainant pointing at obvious matters of common concern. Institutional neglect does not absolve individuals of their positive duty of care, the relevance of that detail will eventually dawn on all involved.We are all accountable in law. I'm not hiding, I've just moved, you're still for the most part where you were, your responsibility to answer in account, no less. I address the offices and the individuals therein, jointly and severally. As the matter in hand implicates the subject of collusion between the P.D. N.H.S. Trust and Dyfed-Powys police, the misuse of mental health detention law being the common binding factor, the context in over view must be seen in the light of the joint responsibilities of both institutions, indivisibly.
May I take this opportunity to welcome Ms. Caroline Oakely Chief Executive to the fray. I advise that you aquaint yourself with the full records of care and the correspondence to date, one hopes copy is retained in an unexpurgated form. Be content that your detatched instinct may serve you better "for your own good" and "in your best interest", than any well meant guideance from your expert entourage.
The path I take is not the easy option afforded cherry picking officials. I have no choice. I must act in accord with my perceived duty. What ever scrutiny is brought to bear upon my private life I accept gladly, there is no stigma in righteousness.
Many would seek to justify retrospectively the illegitimate use of contingencies within law that allows individuals to be targeted and victimised. Such practice has existed "on the nod "for decades. The proposed amendment to the M.H.A. in 2002 was not passed on the grounds that it violated human rights. Up to that point, causeless arrest and detention without the offer of representation and enforced medication by the undue influence of prejudiced, unqualified unverifiable bogus opinion of a third party, without a charge being made and without a crime having been committed, up to that point such circumstance not being legitimised , did not prevent that act to be forced upon me. Seemingly as though a practice for the anticipated bit of business, in the event of the Bill being passed.
Both institutions appear in concert to have acted contrary to the intended meaning of the law. All safeguards and failsafes against harm and liability were abandoned, statutory guidelines of confidentiality ignored. Improper administration of medication without clinical or medical need in spite of contra indications that prohibited their use, without informed consent. Medicines that in my genotype carry a 20 times greater risk of harmful side effects. All allusion to my ethnicity given that it is of relevance to the safety, the subject was treated as vocal symptoms of delusion. My faith, my vocational calling, all cultural references treated as obvious signs of illness, all self definition contemptously and deliberately ignored. The place of safety order, in no way afforded any sense of safety in what I perceive may be seen as an enclave of unreconstructed NeoLiberal racist ignorance, by neglect if not by design.
If my allegations were not well founded I would not dare to express my self openly thus. By a lifetimes principled practice, I do not lie. I do hope the unambiguous meaning of my words is "coherent" now, executives all.
With reference to a previous posting, if you see two professional carers coming to your aid , forty five per cent of them may abuse you and the other fifty five percent will do absolutely nothing to stop it. Statistics are easily obscured. The context of my case, it's not just a story it is of it's nature complex. I've been criticised for my long winded explainations. Form follows function, content over style. The writing serves to fit the subject the intellect must by it's will apply itself to understand. DON'T SHIRK THE WORK! I am up for it. You are paid to take the pains.
In exposing certain wrong doing I will of necessity be exposing many details of my private life which in other circumstance would remain discretely concealed. To prove breach of confidentiality guidelines and the shortfall of O'Sullivan's mutated abusers charter I must reveal details of family matters , I will be careful how ,when and where the information would be put. I am undaunted to reveal all freely without fear or shame.
CUPPA FOR IZNIBZ! Have one yerself!